Theories of Inequality essays

Theories of Inequality essays In briefly evaluating the classical and modern explanations of social inequality, it is essential that we step outside the realm of our own lives, class position, and discard any assumptions we might have about the nature of inequality. This process of critical pedagogy allows us to view our world, not from our perspective, but from a wider, more critical analysis of inequalitys nature. Also, it should be considered within this wider perspective that all theories of inequality have a class perspective, where the theorist, based on the position their theory takes, is making claims from (or for) a particular class (whether they want to or not). With this in mind, it seems that most of these theories come from fairly elite class perspectives and, in turn, tend to be more pessimistic about bringing change to the inequalities they are evaluating. Of the classical (elite) explanations of inequality, Max Webers seemed to be most accepted within the domain of sociology and other social sciences dealing with modes of inequality. Weber, who believes that we are living within a sort of iron cage which cannot allow us to look beyond the rules and regulations of our capitalist system, emphasizes the importance of power relationships in society. Those who are in class positions at the top of the apex (of power distribution) are the people who, one, hold most of the power in society, and two, make the choices for the direction and reproduction of society. The majorities at the bottom of the apex, with very limited power, are unable to make choices that would bring them to their ends. The core attributes of the economic system are alienation and the bureaucracy, which create a dehumanizing effect on the characters within the system. The bureaucracy, with its rational legal authority, clear division of labor, career systems, and impersonality, is technologically more perfect than any other system (according to Web...

The Difference Between Molality and Molarity

The Difference Between Molality and Molarity If you pick up a stock solution from a shelf in the lab and its 0.1 m HCl, do you know if thats a 0.1 molal solution or a 0.1 molar solution, or if there is even a difference? Understanding  molality and  molarity is important in chemistry because these units are among the most commonly used to describe solution concentration. What m and M Mean in Chemistry Both m and M are units of the concentration of a chemical solution. The lowercase m indicates molality, which is calculated using moles of solute per kilograms of solvent. A solution using these units is called a molal solution (e.g., 0.1 m NaOH is a 0.1 molal solution of sodium hydroxide). Uppercase M is molarity, which is moles of solute per liter of solution (not solvent). A solution using this unit is termed  a molar solution (e.g., 0.1 M NaCl is a 0.1 molar solution of sodium chloride). Formulas for Molality and Molarity Molality (m) moles solute / kilograms solventThe units of molality are mol/kg. Molarity (M) moles solute / liters solutionThe units of molarity are mol/L. When m and M Are Almost the Same If your solvent is water at room temperature, m and M can be roughly the same, so if an exact concentration doesnt matter, you can use either solution. The values are closest to each other when the amount of solute is small because molality is for kilograms of solvent, while molarity takes into account the volume of the entire solution. So, if the solute takes up a lot of volume in a solution, m and M wont be as comparable. This brings up a common mistake people make when preparing molar solutions. Its important to dilute a molar solution to the correct volume rather than add a volume of solvent. For example, if youre making 1 liter of a 1 M NaCl solution, you would first measure one mole of salt, add it to a beaker or volumetric flask, and then dilute the salt with water to reach the 1-liter mark. It is incorrect to mix one mole of salt and one liter of water. Molality and molarity are not interchangeable at high solute concentrations, in situations where the temperature changes, or when the solvent is not water. When to Use One Over the Other Molarity is more common because most solutions are made by measuring solutes by mass and then diluting a solution to the desired concentration with a liquid solvent. For typical lab use, its easy to make and use a molar concentration. Use molarity for dilute aqueous solutions at a constant temperature. Molality is used when the solute and solvent interact with each other, when the temperature of the solution will change, when the solution is concentrated, or for a nonaqueous solution. You would also use molality rather than molarity when youre calculating boiling point, boiling point elevation, melting point, or freezing point depression or working with other colligative properties of matter. Learn More Now that you understand what molarity and molality are, learn how to calculate them and how to use concentration to determine mass, moles, or volume of the components of a solution.